Biostatistics / Public Health • Updated On August 17, 2025

Risk Ratios in Health Research

When you compare two groups, one of the most useful ways to see the difference is by looking at the ratio of their risks. This quantity is called the risk ratio, also known as relative risk, and it is one of the most common measures in clinical research and epidemiology. It provides a simple way of saying how much more likely or less likely an outcome is in one group compared with another. You will see that the risk ratio captures the strength of association between exposure and outcome in a way that is easy to interpret.

What is a Risk Ratio

The risk ratio compares the probability of an event in one group with the probability in another. It is written as

RR = \frac{p_1}{p_0} = \frac{d_1 / n_1}{d_0 / n_0}

Here p_1 is the risk in the exposed or treatment group, p_0 is the risk in the unexposed or control group, d_1 and d_0 are the number of events, and n_1 and n_0 are the group sizes. The result shows how many times more likely or less likely the event is in the first group compared with the second.

Worked Example with Diet and Heart Disease

Imagine a large study following two groups of adults for five years. One group includes twenty five thousand people who report a diet rich in vegetables and fruits. The second group includes twenty five thousand people with low fruit and vegetable intake. Over the study period, 150 individuals in the high intake group developed heart disease while 300 individuals in the low intake group developed the condition. The data are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Hypothetical data on diet and heart disease
Group Heart disease No heart disease Total Risk
High intake 150 24,850 25,000 p_1 = 150 / 25,000 = 0.006 (0.6%)
Low intake 300 24,700 25,000 p_0 = 300 / 25,000 = 0.012 (1.2%)
Total 450 49,550 50,000 –

The risk difference between groups is 1.2 percent minus 0.6 percent which equals 0.6 percent. The risk ratio is

RR = \frac{0.006}{0.012} = 0.5

This means that adults with high fruit and vegetable intake had half the risk of developing heart disease compared to those with lower intake.

How to Interpret the Risk Ratio

The risk ratio can be interpreted in three main ways:

  • A risk ratio of 1 means the risk is identical in both groups, suggesting no association between the factor and the outcome.
  • A risk ratio greater than 1 means the risk is higher in the exposed group. For example, if a medicine increased side effects compared with a placebo, the risk ratio would be above 1.
  • A risk ratio less than 1 means the risk is lower in the exposed group, suggesting a protective effect. The diet example above is a case where the risk ratio is below 1.

The farther the number is from 1, the stronger the relationship. Because the ratio is always positive, it can never be less than zero.

Confidence Intervals for Risk Ratio

Any estimate from a sample is uncertain. Confidence intervals allow you to see the range of plausible values for the population risk ratio. The standard approach uses the natural logarithm of the risk ratio. The formula is

\text{CI for RR} = \exp \left( \ln(RR) \pm z \times SE(\ln(RR)) \right)

The standard error is calculated as

SE(\ln(RR)) = \sqrt{ \frac{1 - p_1}{d_1} + \frac{1 - p_0}{d_0} }

Using the diet example, the risk ratio was 0.5. The natural log of 0.5 is -0.693. Substituting the numbers gives a standard error close to 0.12. A 95 percent confidence interval becomes

\exp(-0.693 \pm 1.96 \times 0.12)

which equals approximately 0.39 to 0.64. This range suggests that the true protective effect of diet lies between a 36 percent and a 61 percent reduction in risk. Even the upper bound still shows a protective association, giving strength to the conclusion.

Applications in Clinical Trials

In trials that test new treatments, risk ratio helps to quickly show whether a therapy reduces or increases risk compared to standard care. For example, a new blood pressure drug may reduce the risk of stroke. If the risk ratio is 0.7, it suggests that treated patients have only seventy percent of the stroke risk compared to untreated patients. This is easier to understand than looking at raw percentages alone. Patients and clinicians find it useful because it communicates relative change in risk clearly.

Health agencies often require both the risk ratio and the absolute difference. The ratio describes relative strength of effect, while the difference communicates actual change in numbers. If a disease is rare, a drug may cut risk in half but the absolute difference may still be small. Both pieces of information matter in decision making.

Real World Applications

Risk ratios appear in many areas of health research. Vaccine studies report relative risk to show effectiveness, for example stating that vaccinated individuals had one third the risk of infection compared to those without the vaccine. Lifestyle research reports risk ratios to show the effect of exercise, diet, or alcohol consumption on disease risk. Public health programs evaluating screening, such as colonoscopy for colon cancer, also rely on relative risk to communicate benefit. These examples show how the measure is deeply embedded in practice.

Risk Ratio Versus Risk Difference

Although both risk ratio and risk difference measure the contrast between groups, they tell different stories. The ratio answers the question of how many times more or less likely an outcome is. The difference answers how many percentage points are gained or lost. In practice, researchers use both. If risks are low, the difference may look very small even when the ratio is large. If risks are higher, the numbers may be easier to grasp in absolute terms.

To see this, imagine the same diet study running twice as long. If twice as many cases occur, the risks would be 1.2 percent in the high intake group and 2.4 percent in the low intake group. The risk ratio is still 0.5 because the relative strength of the effect has not changed. But the risk difference doubles from 0.6 percent to 1.2 percent. This shows why both measures complement each other in communication.

Key Takeaways

  • Risk ratio is a simple way to compare likelihood of outcomes between two groups.
  • A value above 1 means higher risk in the exposed, a value below 1 means lower risk in the exposed.
  • Confidence intervals give the range of plausible values and help judge precision.
  • Risk ratio is common in studies of treatment, prevention, lifestyle, and screening.
  • Both risk ratio and risk difference should be considered for a complete picture.

Related Articles